In the digital age, the power of traditional gatekeepers of information dissemination has diminished, and it’s now increasingly important to verify the credibility of information you encounter and potentially pass on.
The ability to identify misinformation online is essential – not only for academic pursuits and professional assignments but also for making informed decisions when performing everyday activities such as shopping and planning travel itineraries. Navigating this complex informational landscape is now a fundamental requirement across modern life.
- Four questions to ask to detect false news online
- Believe it or not, you can use conspiracy theories as tools for teaching
- A four-step process to transform everyone into a fact-checker
To effectively identify misinformation, approach the task from two distinct perspectives: the external perspective, which focuses on the information itself, and the internal perspective, which examines your own biases and assumptions. By addressing both aspects, you can enhance your ability to critically evaluate the information you receive and make well-informed decisions.
Part 1: External aspects
First, trace the origin of the information you’re working with. This allows you to evaluate key elements such as the author and the evidence used to support the content, as well as the context in which the information was originally published.
1. Examine the author
Evaluate the author’s credibility by examining their credentials, whether they represent an individual, a website or a publication. Authors with a proven history of accuracy and reliability are generally more trustworthy. Conduct thorough research into the author’s credentials and previous work.
Once you have gathered this information, assess whether the content is presented objectively or if it appears to advocate a specific agenda. Identifying bias can help you critically evaluate the information. Be mindful that some websites publish content intended for humour or satire.
Websites such as The Onion and The Beaverton are well known for their satirical content, producing fictional news stories or exaggerated interpretations of current events to amuse readers. For example, The Onion has published headlines such as “World Death Rate Holding Steady at 100 Per Cent” and “Health Experts Recommend Standing Up At Desk, Leaving Office, Never Coming Back”, which are articles intended solely as satire, not factual reporting. Check for labels indicating so, to make sure it’s not being misconstrued as factual news.
2. Examine the evidence
- Headline accuracy: Be wary of misleading headlines. Always read the entire article to understand the full context and avoid drawing conclusions based solely on a catchy title.
- Evidence verification: Seek supporting evidence in the form of data, expert opinions or cited studies. Articles lacking evidence or relying on anonymous sources should raise red flags. Legitimate articles will typically quote experts with informed insights.
- Source cross-verification: Reliable information is usually reported by multiple reputable sources. Consider whether the information is supported by multiple experts in the field or corroborated by well-known news outlets. If a sensational story is reported only by an obscure site, question its validity.
- Language analysis: Be cautious of articles that use sensational or emotionally charged language, intended to provoke a strong reaction. Language like this can often indicate a lack of objectivity.
3. Examine the context
Consider the context by answering these questions: why the information was created, what environment nurtured it and what the author aimed to express. A key element of context is the time when the information was published. Outdated news can sometimes resurface and be shared as if it were current. Always verify the publication date to ensure that the information is timely and relevant.
Once all the criteria above have been thoroughly assessed, you can place your confidence in the information. But keep in mind the internal factors that will affect our judgement.
Part 2: Internal aspects
As we process information online, we must continuously reflect on our biases, recognising and understanding the predispositions that shape our interpretation of information. These biases can arise from various sources, including personal experiences, cultural background and the media we consume. We might tend towards confirmation bias, seeking information that supports our existing views while dismissing contradictory evidence. This tendency is concerning because it can lead us to overlook misinformation that reinforces our existing beliefs – and ultimately form misbeliefs.
By acknowledging these tendencies, you can foster self-awareness, cultivate open-mindedness and enhance the quality of your decision-making and interactions with others. This self-awareness is crucial for developing a more objective viewpoint. Although it is naturally uncomfortable, cultivating awareness of personal biases is often challenging. The strategies involved are not concrete but require nurturing a mindset that is open-minded and receptive to criticism, especially when information challenges one’s core beliefs.
By addressing internal and external factors when seeking to identify misinformation online, you can become more skilled at discerning false information and making informed decisions about the content you encounter. While technologies continue to evolve, remember the core principles: trace the origin of information and maintain self-awareness to avoid falling into the pitfalls of personal biases. These strategies will be valuable regardless of the state of technological advancements.
Stephanie Jean Tsang is associate professor in the department of communications at Hong Kong Baptist University.
If you would like advice and insight from academics and university staff delivered direct to your inbox each week, sign up for the Campus newsletter.
comment