Are we doing enough to support multilingual learners? Too many institutions are relying on a narrow, compliance-driven approach, usually starting with extended time on exams or assignments, and not going much further.
While extended time may ease logistical pressure, it does not address the deeper linguistic, cultural and academic realities multilingual learners face. Language barriers are often treated as issues of speed or deficiency, rather than as complex learning processes shaped by disciplinary discourse, educational norms and institutional design. As a result, the responsibility for navigating these challenges is placed almost entirely on students, rather than shared as an institutional commitment to equity and academic quality.
- Unlock the benefits of multilingualism in higher education
- Peer review in multilingual classes
- Australian universities need to do more than pay lip service to multilingualism
Drawing on research on institutional practices, here, I’ll introduce the Life Framework, a model designed to help us move beyond minimal accommodation toward intentional, equity-driven support for multilingual learners across disciplines.
Why extended time is not enough
A language barrier is not a disability, nor is it a measure of intelligence or academic readiness. It reflects the demanding task of interpreting, analysing and communicating complex ideas in a language that is not your first, often while adapting to unfamiliar expectations around participation, assessment and academic writing.
When we rely solely on extended time, we reduce a multidimensional learning experience to a procedural adjustment. This approach assumes the primary challenge is pace, when really the primary difficulties are context, comprehension and academic expression. Extended time may help students complete tasks, but it does little to support deeper learning, confidence or long-term academic development.
To support multilingual learners effectively, we must shift from reactive accommodations to proactive, intentional design.
The Life Framework: a general model for institutional support
The Life Framework offers a scalable approach applicable across disciplines and institutional contexts.
L: Language as an academic and professional competency
We should treat language as a core academic and professional competency, rather than a remedial concern. Across fields, students are expected to engage with discipline-specific vocabulary, complex texts, analytical writing and professional communication. When we recognise language development as integral to learning, we can create structures that strengthen our students’ academic success and workforce readiness.
I: Integration into curriculum, not isolation
Embed language support within coursework rather than isolating it in separate remediation or ESL tracks. Scaffolded assignments, guided readings and clear expectations in disciplinary content help students to connect language learning with conceptual understanding.
F: Faculty preparation and bias-aware teaching
Faculty play a central role in multilingual student success. Even experienced educators may not be trained to distinguish between language-related expression and conceptual understanding. Bias-aware teaching practices can help instructors focus assessment on reasoning, insight and learning outcomes rather than surface-level fluency, creating more equitable classrooms.
For example, an instructor may evaluate a written assignment primarily on the student’s conceptual understanding and analysis while providing separate, supportive feedback on grammar or language structure. Similarly, faculty can provide multiple ways for students to demonstrate learning, such as presentations, concept maps or visual explanations, so that multilingual students can show their reasoning and mastery of course material, even as they continue to develop academic English proficiency.
E: Experiential and community-based support
Many multilingual learners report isolation as a significant barrier to success. Learning communities, peer mentorship, collaborative projects and informal communication spaces provide authentic opportunities for engagement and belonging. These environments strengthen language development while also supporting confidence, persistence and academic identity.
Using the framework in practice
While the Life Framework applies broadly across higher education, its relevance is obvious in disciplines that require precision, collaboration and professional communication. For example, in health-related programmes, language competence directly affects ethical practice, teamwork and patient communication. Similar dynamics exist in education, public policy, engineering and other professional fields.
In these contexts, extended time may help students complete assessments, but it cannot prepare them to analyse research, collaborate effectively or communicate clearly in professional settings. Educators who apply the Life Framework design learning environments to support multilingual learners from the outset, rather than relying on last-minute accommodations.
From accommodation to institutional responsibility
Supporting multilingual learners is not about lowering standards or offering special treatment. It is about recognising linguistic diversity as an asset and ensuring that institutional systems are designed to support learning equitably.
When institutions shift from minimal compliance to intentional, inclusive design, multilingual learners do more than succeed academically – they thrive. They contribute leadership, innovation and global perspectives that strengthen higher education as a whole.
Walaa Awad is an educator at Colorado State University Global.
If you would like advice and insight from academics and university staff delivered direct to your inbox each week, sign up for the Campus newsletter.
comment